|
|
Item Posts
Sort Order
|
|
|
|
Whats Better
|
LOMF
New User
| Posts: 9
| Joined: 10/05
Posted: 11/02/05 11:15 AM
|
|
Hey are there ne 750 bikes better than he 2000 Suzuki GSXR750?
|
|
|
|
Spyke
User
| Posts: 246
| Joined: 09/05
Posted: 11/02/05 12:05 PM
|
|
Aren't suzuki and ducati the only factories to make a 750/748 still? I think everyone else uses liter v-twins for that category...that being said i'd say for the money go for the suzuki
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/02/05 07:56 PM
|
|
Quote:
Hey are there ne 750 bikes better than he 2000 Suzuki GSXR750?
Sure. The 2001 GSXR750... 2002 GSXR750... 2003 GSXR750... 2004 GSXR750... 2005 GSXR750.... 2006 GSXR750.... Newer is always better. Right?
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/02/05 09:25 PM
|
|
Chris is actually right, lots of changes made in the latest versions.
|
|
|
|
LOMF
New User
| Posts: 9
| Joined: 10/05
Posted: 11/03/05 01:47 PM
|
|
yea but according to the sport rider performance numbers the 2000 has the faster top speed and quicker quarter mile time
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 03:08 PM
|
|
unless those numbers are significantly different, it's basically a wash. E.T is all about the rider. trap speed is the best indicator of power. But test numbers are only ballpark, it all depends on the test conditions.
And if all you care about is power and speed, just get a liter bike!
|
|
|
|
huligan
New User
| Posts: 7
| Joined: 11/05
Posted: 11/03/05 07:58 PM
|
|
depends on your riding style, and where you ride most. down here, there are plenty of high speed sweepers, but no good twisty roads. a literbike is good here. look at a sv1000 or superhawk or rc51 or interceptor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|